Sunday, December 17, 2006

Sexual Offenders and Society

I've decided to set some time aside and create a sampling of news and commentary throughout society centered on sexual offenders. The intent behind this effort is to expose the reader to some of the issues that sexual offenders have to deal with. Again and again, we see that society has placed hurdle after hurdle in the way of these people overcoming the issues they struggle with. This is a work in progress.

Oshkosh Northwestern - 12/18/2006

Sexual offender notification meeting tonight

A sexual offender community notification meeting will be held tonight at 7 p.m. in room 406 of City Hall, 215 Church Ave.

[The offender], 27, was released from prison in November and will be living on [address].

The Mercury News - 12/17/2006

Law may push sex-crime offenders from downtown San Diego

San Diego police said they want to reduce the number of sex offenders who live downtown.

The Columbus Dispatch - 12/17/06

Forcing offenders to move isn't easy

"I was born right next door," [the offender] said. "My mother owned this property and gave me my home as a wedding gift in 1958."

He also said he couldn’t afford to move even if he wanted to.

"While it means something to me, I wouldn’t make enough money selling this house," he said. "The only thing I can do is keep living where I am."


[The offender], 50, committed sexual battery on his adult ex-girlfriend in 1996, he said. Since then, he has married a "beautiful woman," bought his childhood home, found a job he loves, had a daughter and is rebuilding his life.

"If a man served his time and hasn’t committed his crime again in a number of years, then I feel that man should have the chance to be included back into society," he said. "He should be able to live wherever he wants."

David Singleton agrees.

"I think it’s one of the worst, most irrational laws that has ever been passed in the state of Ohio," said Singleton, executive director of the Ohio Justice and Policy Center. "It’s absurd and doesn’t protect the kids or the communities. But no politician will do anything, because they don’t want to appear soft on sex offenders."

An Akron psychologist agrees.

... Dr. Joseph Salwan, who specializes in adolescent and adult sexual addiction and deviance. "It provides a false sense of security to people and works against our ability to integrate and rehabilitate the offenders into society."

KNX1070 NEWSRADIO - 12/17/06

New Database Will Determine Where Offenders Can Live

...a map of the off-limit areas for sex offenders shows only a few blocks of downtown San Diego that would be available to sex offenders if the residency requirements are enforced, the newspaper reported.

San Diego police Sgt. Mark Sullivan said a first-of-its-kind database was being developed that would tell sex offenders where they could and could not move.


Sex offender registry filled with errors

Sure, the sex offender registration sounds good in theory. But in practice it's basically useless to the public, and when it's filled with errors and omissions it becomes actively harmful. At this point, I can't identify any real public safety use for it at all. All that appears to be left is it's PR value.

Austin American-Statesman - 12/16/06

Gaps in local online data about sex offenders includes inaccurate, missing information

An American-Statesman review of 100 sex offender records from the police site also shows that it is often in conflict with the statewide Web site maintained by the Texas Department of Public Safety

Sunday Mirror - 12/17/06


Perverts who steal women's underwear from washing lines could be added to the sex offenders' register under a crackdown to be announced by Home Secretary John Reid tomorrow.

Comment: That's ten years to life of pure living hell

KCTV Channel 5 News - taken from site 12/18/06

Commission recommends examining prison rate, sex offender laws

Also during the meeting, representatives from the Oklahoma Sex Offender Management Team told commissioners the restrictive nature of the state's sex offender laws, which forbid registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school, playground or day care center, are forcing many offenders to either move out of urban areas _ where most areas now are off-limits for them _ into rural areas, where treatment options are limited, or not register at all.

The Legislature should consider rescinding or revising those residency requirements, said Richard Kishur, an Oklahoma City doctor who provides treatment to sex offenders and a member of the Sex Offender Management Team. "We all have the central focus of keeping our citizens safe," Kishur told commissioners, saying one of the "unintended consequences" of the current law is that "we're partitioning off sex offenders, and unfortunately, they're going into rural communities."

Washington Post - 12/12/06

Virginia Proposal Aims to Keep Sex Offenders Off Networking Sites

Virginia Attorney General Robert F. McDonnell (R) said Monday that he will push for legislation requiring sex offenders to register their e-mail addresses and instant messaging screen names

Telegram & Gazette - 12/15/06

Mayor correctly vetoed sex offender bill

Though laudable in their intent, these laws create more problems than they solve. They cause sex offenders to become transient and sometimes homeless, making them more difficult to track and supervise. Despite widespread popularity, there is no empirical evidence that sex offender residence restrictions prevent sex crimes or increase public safety. In fact, disrupting offenders’ stability is unlikely to be in the public’s best interest because it exacerbates the psychosocial stressors that can contribute to reoffending.

Reno Gazette-Journal - 12/15/06

2 high-risk sex offenders move to Reno, Sparks

Two men designated by the state as high-risk sex offenders have moved into the area, officers of the Regional Sex Offender Notification Unit said Thursday.

Comment: The local newspaper announces arrivals of sex offenders? - 12/11/06

When the new neighbor is a sex offender

Simply creating fear and distrust hardly seems like the best "notification" system.

CSI - 9/06

Predator Panic: A Closer Look

...state emergency leaders in Florida and Texas, for example, are developing plans to oute convicted sex offenders away from public emergency shelters during hurricanes. “We don’t want them in the same shelters as others,” said Texas omeland Security Director Steve McCraw.

Imagine you were in the midst of an intense struggle to overcome an addiction you detest, and having to deal with all of this on top of it.

Purple Saffron


At 12/18/2006 12:48 PM, Blogger ZMan! said...

Sex Offender Info Wiki
Sex Offender Issues Blog

My Comments On Sex Offender Issues:
* If the sex offender laws are kept, why discriminate? If sex offenders must suffer for life and be on GPS, so should ANYONE with a criminal record. If this is not done, then it is discrimination. Anyone with a criminal record should be on a registry on the internet for the whole world to see, and be on GPS for life. DUI offenders should not be able to live XX feet from an alcohol store and should have their license revoked. Drug dealers should not be able to live XX feet from anywhere children congregate, so they cannot sell our kids drugs. Murderers should not be able to life XX feet from ANYONE, since they may kill again. DUI offenders kill more people than any other crime (I believe), and I'm sure the entire public would love to know if a murderer, thief, drug dealer, etc lives in their neighborhood. If all this was on the internet for all to see, I'm sure everyone would NOT leave their house at all. These people are everywhere. Why are sex offenders being "scape goated"? EVERYONE WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD SHOULD OBIDE BY THE SAME LAWS SEX OFFENDERS HAVE TO OR IT'S DISCRIMINATION!!

* "Buffer Zones" are a false sense of security!

* "Buffer Zones" are banishing people from their town, state, and possibly the country!

* "Buffer Zones" create homelessness, which costs society lost productivity, individual dignity, and creates additional problems for enforcing any accurate registry!

* "Buffer Zones" do nothing, except banish! If someone wanted to re-offend, they'd just get in a car and drive!

* These laws protect nobody!

* "Stranger Danger" is a smoke screen & hype! Most child sexual offenses occur by someone the child knows, like a family member or close friend!

* These laws are being passed by politicians using sex offenders as scape goats, for votes!

* Registries do NOT protect anyone or prevent crimes!

* Registries are punishing sex offenders as well as their families and children, and opening them up to vigilantism. DON'T THE FAMILIES AND CHILDREN OF SEX OFFENDERS COUNT? They are suppose to be "for the children", right?

* Registries are NOT being updated in a timely fashion, so the public is getting false information! How is this helping the public or protecting them when they cannot rely on them?

* Registries are putting families and children of sex offenders in a public position to be socially outcast and discriminated against with regard to employment, housing, schooling, etc!

* About 90% of the people on the registry are NOT sexual predators or pedophiles that these laws were for in the first place!

* These laws cost millions, if not billions to enforce, and they cause prison over-population, which is already a problem, especially in California! AND TAX PAYERS PAY FOR ALL THIS!

* GPS does not prevent sexual crimes! Another false sense of security which cost tons of money! Plus they are suppose to pay for this, which will eventually go homeless. MAKE THE TAX PAYERS WHO WANT THESE LAWS TO PAY FOR THEM!

* These laws cause sex offenders to go underground and into hiding, due to the strict nature of the laws! How is this protecting anyone?

* These laws are all abount money for law enforcement and votes for politicians. Prison is a business! Politicians are salaried and want elected/re-elected! Law enforcement get paid for people in jails, prisons or on the registry!

* These laws blatantly disregard the United States constitutional rights of all citizens! (i.e. ex-post facto, due process & others)

* These laws are cruel and unusual punishment! A sex offender cannot go to a fast food restaurant which has a playground! Why? We have just as must of a right as you to get a burger! Plus they cannot go anywhere kids congregate, which is endless (i.e. Amusement parks, Movie theaters, the list is endless)

* Sex offenders can go to church, but must leave immediately afterwards. If a sex offender owns a business and someone decides to put a church or school next door, they have to now sell their business and move. This is not right, move the church or school, the sex offender was there first!

* These laws continue to punish people even after a sentence has been served, and they are trying to get on with their lives! (i.e. ex-post facto)

* These laws are driven by fear-mongering, opportunistic politicians and will do nothing to actually protect children!

* There are over one million women and children whose lives are inter-twined with a sex offender in the United Stated. They should matter too!

* Follow the money trail, these laws are conveyor-belt laws to benefit law enforcement! They get paid for the number of people in jail, prison or on the registry!

* They are currently a one-size-fits all for sex offenders! Not all sex offenders are predators or pedophiles that these laws are suppose to be for anyway!

* They are modern day witch hunts and a scarlett letter!

* If Sex Offenders are re-offending, why does the registries grow each day? Because new people are being added daily for stuff like "public urination", "mooning", "concensual sex", "young children playing 'Doctor'" and various other minor offenses that we need not worry about. We need to worry about predators & pedophiles!

* Now they are trying to make it a law that a sex offender, if they have kids, cannot "take a picture" of anyone under 18. This is totally stupid! Can't even take Christmas pictures, birthday pictures, etc!

* Also, because a sex offender owns a business in town, many people are trying to get the business shut down! The sex offender had the business for awhile. If you don't like it, MOVE!!!!

* The Nazi' did this back when Hitler was in power, with the Jews, Turks, etc.

* The thing about pedophiles not being able to take pictures of kids is stupid. You'd better shred any pictures you have of your kids when they were babies, like diaper changing, baths, etc, it may be seen as porn!

At 1/28/2011 3:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=]Lesbian Porn[/url]

At 1/17/2013 6:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

top [url=]casino bonus[/url] brake the latest [url=]casino bonus[/url] unshackled no store bonus at the chief [url=]


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home